"The Canon of Truth:
Why 66 Books and Not 72?"
The Formation and Significance
of the 66 Books of the Bible
Introduction
The Bible is not merely a collection of sacred writings—it is a testimony of divine revelation, preserved through millennia with precision, passion, and immense cost. Behind the canon of the 66 books lies a remarkable history marked by empires, translations, theological conflicts, and martyrdom.
​
This article traces that story from the days of Alexander the Great and the famed Library of Alexandria, through Jewish and Christian canonical developments, and into the defining moments that separated the Protestant canon from the Catholic one. This exploration is crucial for students, pastors, and scholars desiring to understand not only the how, but the why, of the biblical canon as we know it today.
​
1. The Library of Alexandria and the Septuagint
In the 4th century B.C., Alexander the Great conquered vast regions of the known world and initiated one of the most ambitious cultural projects in human history—the Library of Alexandria. His successors in Egypt, particularly Ptolemy II (283–246 B.C.), sought to gather the wisdom of all nations into this library. As part of this vision, Jewish scholars were invited to translate their Scriptures into the common Greek of the day (koine Greek), which led to the creation of the Septuagint (LXX).
​
According to tradition, seventy Jewish elders worked on the translation, producing a Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures. This version included not only the canonical books but also additional writings later known as the Deuterocanonical books or Apocrypha.
The Septuagint became the primary Scripture of the early Church, especially among Gentile believers, and shaped the theology of the early centuries. However, it also introduced books not originally included in the Hebrew canon.
​
2. The Canonization Process: From Scrolls to Scripture
The process of canonization was gradual, stretching over centuries. By the time of Jesus, the Hebrew Bible was largely recognized among Jewish communities, though debates persisted over some books. The early Church initially used the Septuagint, including the Deuterocanonical books, but gradually began distinguishing between those books that were apostolic in origin and those merely useful.
​
The key moments in defining the New Testament canon include
-
Muratorian Fragment (ca. 170 A.D.) – an early list of accepted New Testament books.
-
Council of Laodicea (363 A.D.), Council of Hippo (393 A.D.), and Council of Carthage (397 A.D.) – progressively solidified the list of New Testament books.
-
Athanasius’ Easter Letter (367 A.D.) – the first known listing of the 27 New Testament books identical to today's canon.
​
By around 400–A.D., the Church had effectively recognized the 66 books we now accept as canon in Protestant circles. The Catholic Church, however, maintained the inclusion of the Deuterocanonical books, eventually affirming them formally at the Council of Trent in 1546, in response to the Protestant Reformation.
​
3. The 66 vs. 72 Books: A Theological and Historical Divide
The Protestant canon comprises 66 books: 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New. The Catholic canon includes an additional 7 books: Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and 1 & 2 Maccabees—plus additions to Esther and Daniel.
​
The difference is not minor, but deeply theological:
-
Protestant Reformers, especially Luther and Calvin, emphasized Sola Scriptura—Scripture alone as the rule of faith—and rejected books that lacked Hebrew origin or apostolic authority.
-
The Deuterocanonical books include teachings on purgatory, prayers for the dead, and merit-based salvation, which Protestant theology views as contradictory to the message of grace and justification by faith.
-
Historically, the Hebrew canon—affirmed by Jewish rabbis at Jamnia (ca. 90 A.D.)—did not include these extra books, which further supported the Protestant position.
Thus, the choice of 66 vs. 72 books is not simply editorial—it reflects distinct worldviews of Scripture, salvation, and authority.
​
4. The Role of the Catholic Church in Canon History (ca. 480 A.D. and onward)
Though the canon was largely recognized by the late 4th century, its transmission and protection were carried by the Catholic Church through the Middle Ages. Monks copied Scriptures by hand, preserving them during the collapse of the Roman Empire and throughout centuries of turmoil.
Yet, it was not until the printing press (1455) and the Reformation (1517 onward) that access to the Bible exploded.
​
Reformers like William Tyndale, Martin Luther, and John Wycliffe paid a heavy price to make the Bible available in the common languages—and they deliberately used the 66-book canon. The Catholic reaction culminated at the Council of Trent (1546), where the 72-book canon was reaffirmed as binding. The Protestant world, however, held firmly to the earlier, Hebrew-based canon of 66 books.
​
5. Modern Translations and Accessibility
Today, the 66-book canon is the basis of most modern Protestant Bibles, translated into over 3,400 languages. From the King James Version (1611) to the NIV, ESV, and other versions, the Scriptures have been made accessible globally.
​
Yet the fight for biblical clarity continues—not in terms of access but of discernment. With the rise of paraphrases, watered-down translations, and theological biases, it is imperative for modern readers to understand not only what the Bible says, but how it came to be.
​
Conclusion: Why It Matters
Understanding the formation of the 66-book canon helps us grasp the integrity, authority, and purpose of God’s Word. It is not a random collection but a divinely orchestrated revelation, preserved at great cost.
​
The decision to exclude the Deuterocanonical books was not a rejection of history but a reaffirmation of inspired truth. To embrace the 66 books is to stand on a foundation rooted in Hebrew prophetic authority, apostolic witness, and spiritual clarity.
​
Today’s Church must return not just to reading the Bible, but to understanding its origin and authority—for in doing so, we are returning to the voice of God Himself, unveiled through the Word.
​
Suggested Readings:
-
F.F. Bruce – The Canon of Scripture
-
Bruce Metzger – The Canon of the New Testament
-
David Daniell – William Tyndale: A Biography
-
R.C. Sproul – Knowing Scripture
​
​
The Three Fundamental Shifts That
Formed the Roman Catholic Church
The Rise of Roman Catholicism
​
The transition from the early apostolic Church to the Roman Catholic institution was not sudden, but the result of three critical historical and theological shifts that gradually redefined Christian faith and authority. These three pillars, each supported by councils and later reinforced by dogma, shaped a church no longer centered solely on Scripture and Christ, but on institutional power, additional doctrines, and hierarchical control.
​
1. The Expanded Canon: From 66 to 72 Books
One of the most significant departures from biblical faith was the inclusion of the Deuterocanonical books—seven additional writings that were not part of the Hebrew Bible but were included in the Septuagint.
-
These books (Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, 1 & 2 Maccabees, plus additions to Daniel and Esther) introduced doctrines like purgatory, prayers for the dead, and works-based merit, which diverge sharply from apostolic teaching.
-
Though used informally for centuries, these books were formally declared inspired Scripture at the Council of Trent (1546) in reaction to the Protestant Reformation.
-
This expansion altered the theological framework and opened the door to practices unsupported by the 66-book canon rooted in Hebrew and apostolic authority.
​
Thus, Scripture alone (Sola Scriptura)—a foundational principle of the early Church and later the Reformation—was replaced with Scripture plus Church authority to define truth.
​
2. The Exaltation of Mary: Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.)​
Following the legalization of Christianity, the Church increasingly aligned itself with imperial authority. Councils were convened not only to resolve doctrinal disputes but to standardize the Church’s teaching and consolidate its structures.
One of the pivotal early moments in this development was the Council of Ephesus in 431 A.D., which recognized Mary as Theotokos — “God-bearer” or “Mother of God.”​ This was not a minor theological clarification. It marked a decisive shift in identity and doctrinal emphasis.
​
-
The term Theotokos was intended to affirm the full divinity of Christ: if Jesus is God, then the woman who bore Him must be the Mother of God.
-
However, this statement laid the foundational theological bedrock for the cult of Mary, which would grow in prominence across the centuries and shape the unique identity of what became the Catholic Church.
🔹 The Rise of Marian Dogmas and the Shift in Church Identity
​
Following the Council of Ephesus, devotion to Mary increased significantly. Over time, her status evolved from blessed among women (Luke 1:42) to being seen as immaculate, ever-virgin, co-mediatrix, and assumed bodily into heaven—doctrines absent from the New Testament and not shared by the early apostles.
​
Key Marian developments include:
-
Perpetual Virginity – Officially upheld by early Catholic theologians like Jerome, despite contrary evidence from Scripture (e.g., Jesus’ brothers).
-
Immaculate Conception – Declared dogma in 1854 by Pope Pius IX, stating Mary was conceived without original sin.
-
Bodily Assumption into Heaven – Declared dogma in 1950 by Pope Pius XII, stating Mary was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.
​
Though these were made official much later, the seeds were planted early, beginning at Ephesus. The exaltation of Mary became a hallmark of Roman Catholic identity, distinguishing it sharply from both Jewish roots and apostolic Christianity.
​​
3. The Vicar of Christ: Rise of the Papacy
The third defining element in the formation of Roman Catholicism was the doctrinal elevation of the bishop of Rome as “Vicar of Christ”—meaning the earthly representative of God and supreme head of the universal Church.
​
Although early bishops of Rome were respected among other church leaders, the first formal use of the title “Vicar of Christ” (Vicarius Christi) is attributed to Pope Gelasius I in 492 A.D., during his clash with Emperor Anastasius. It was at this point that the bishop of Rome began to claim supremacy over all churches, grounding his authority in the so-called “Petrine doctrine”—the belief that Peter was the first pope, and his authority passed on to the Roman bishop.
​
The first historical figure widely recognized as a “Pope” in the modern sense, with universal authority over Christendom, was Pope Leo I (“Leo the Great”), who served from 440 to 461 A.D. He significantly expanded Roman primacy and declared the bishop of Rome as the successor of Peter, a view eventually accepted by Western bishops.
​
However, it was not until the First Vatican Council (Vatican I) in 1870 that the Catholic Church officially declared the doctrine of Papal Infallibility—teaching that when the Pope speaks ex cathedra (from the chair of Peter) on matters of faith and morals, his words are infallible and binding for all Catholics.
​
This doctrinal development effectively replaced the authority of Scripture and the Holy Spirit in the believer with the institutional voice of a single man, a notion utterly foreign to the early Church, which operated by apostolic plurality, shared eldership, and the leading of the Holy Spirit.
The papal system not only centralized power in Rome but redefined the Church as an institution governed by a monarch, rather than a spiritual body led by Christ and built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Ephesians 2:20).
​
Written by Fernando Jiménez
Pastor & Bible Teacher
Founder of the Kerygma Revival Institute
“Let the Dialogue Begin.”
Have questions about Scripture or Church history?
Let’s walk through them honestly and biblically.